ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio OR=5.618, 95% confidence interval CI) 2.136-14.776, P0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: COVID 19 and increasing unmet needs of health technology had accelerated an adoption of digital health globally and the major categories are mobile-health, health information technology, telemedicine. Digital health interventions have various benefit on clinical efficacy, quality of care and reducing healthcare costs. The objective of the study is to identify new reimbursement policy trend of digital health medical devices in South Korea. Method(s): Official announcements published in national bodies and supplementary secondary research were used to capture policies, frameworks and currently approved products since 2019. Result(s): With policy development, several digital health devices and AI software have been introduced as non-reimbursement by utilizing new Health Technology Assessment (nHTA) pathway including grace period of nHTA and innovative medical devices integrated assessment pathway. AI based cardiac arrest risk management software (DeepCARS) and electroceutical device for major depressive disorders (MINDD STIM) have been approved as non-reimbursement use for about 3 years. Two digital therapeutics for insomnia and AI software for diagnosis of cerebral infarction were approved as the first innovative medical devices under new integrated assessment system, and they could be treated in the market. In addition, there is remote patient monitoring (RPM) reimbursement service fee. Continuous glucose monitoring devices have been reimbursed for type 1 diabetes patients by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) since January 2019. Homecare RPM service for peritoneal dialysis patients with cloud platform (Sharesource) has been reimbursed since December 2019, and long-term continuous ECG monitoring service fee for wearable ECG monitoring devices (ATpatch, MEMO) became reimbursement since January 2022. Conclusion(s): Although Korean government has been developed guidelines for digital health actively, only few products had been reimbursed. To introduce new technologies for improved patient centric treatment, novel value-based assessment and new pricing guideline of digital health medical devices are quite required.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Purpose: to analyze the ability of the National Health Insurance mobile service quality to build BPJS brand image and public trust to increase intention to use online services during the Covid period. The background of this research is based on the phenomenon in the form of complaints on the quality of online services and research gaps on the effect of service quality on the intention to use online services. Brand image and trust are offered as a mediation for gaps in previous research results. Design/ methodology/approach: The type of research is quantitative, using a pre-existing measurement scale related to mobile service quality, brand image, trust and intention. Involving a sample of 140 BPJS users during the Covid pandemic. It is difficult to identify the population size, the sample size is determined by the formulation of a constant value of 5 multiplied by 28 indicators. The technique of selecting respondents was carried out by means of non-probability random sampling. PLS SEM model as an analysis tool. Findings: The results of this study indicate that the direct relationship of mobile service quality on brand image, trust and intention shows significant positive results. Furthermore, the influence of brand image on trust shows significant results. The influence of brand image and trust on intention is also found to be significantly positive. Practical/implications: although management policies encourage customers to use mobile services more, the public still considers the trustworthy image of BPJS to develop their intention to use mobile application services. The government must remain consistent in ensuring that the quality of mobile service is not compromised because the implications for BPJS image and public trust are at stake. Through the person in charge at BPJS, the government must continue to consistently evaluate and improve the system and educate the public regarding this BPJS health mobile service system. Originality/value: This research offers new insights, filling gaps in studies on national health insurance mobile services during the Covid-19 Pandemic
ABSTRACT
The recent Covid-19 pandemic has created many challenges and barriers in healthcare, which includes the treatment and management of patients with type 2 diabetes (Robson & Hosseinzadeh, 2021). The purpose of this Evidence-Based Project (EBP) project is to evaluate the effectiveness of type 2 diabetes management through telehealth and answers the following PICOT question: In patients with diabetes type 2 who have difficulties with medical visit compliance (P), will the telehealth platform (I), compared to patient's previous visit HbA1c (C) improve the Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) diagnostic marker (O) over a 12-week period(T)? An extensive literature search of five databases was performed, citation chasing, and a hand search yielded fourteen pieces of evidence ranging from level I to VI (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The pieces of evidence selected for this project support the evidence that telehealth implementation is as effective as the "usual care" or in-person visits to treat type 2 diabetes. The John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model was selected. Patients with a HbA1c of greater than 6.7% have been asked to schedule two six-week telehealth visits. During the live video visit, a review of medications, and diabetes self-management education (DSME) will be conducted. Participants will be provided with education to promote lifestyle modifications. The visits will be conducted through an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system that is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. A paired t-Test will be used with the data collected from the pre-and post-HbA1c. Improve the management of type 2 diabetes with the incorporation of telemedicine in primary care. Research supports the need to further expand the use of telehealth in primary care, to improve patient outcomes and decrease co-morbidities related to type 2 diabetes.
ABSTRACT
Disparities in the incidence, prevalence, and morbidity and mortality rates of many respiratory diseases are evident among ethnic groups. Biological, cultural and environmental factors related to ethnicity can all contribute to the differences in respiratory health observed among ethnic minority groups, but the inequalities observed are most commonly due to lower socioeconomic position. People who migrate within a country or across an international border may experience an improvement in respiratory health associated with improvements in socioeconomic position. However, migrants may also experience worse health outcomes in destination countries, as they are faced by barriers in language and culture, discrimination, exclusion and limited access to health services. While some high-quality studies investigating ethnicity and respiratory health are available, further research into ethnic differences is needed. Improving the recording of ethnicity in health records, addressing barriers to accessing respiratory healthcare and improving cultural literacy more generally are some of the ways that inequalities can be tackled.Copyright © ERS 2023.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Post COVID-19 conditions or long COVID continues to burden the healthcare system. With the introduction of new code in October 2021 to appropriately capture this condition (U09.9), we have enough data to understand the detailed demographic and clinical characterization of the patients with long COVID. As this new clinical entity continues to evolve, our study will provide insights for care management and planning. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective cohort study from a large deidentified database of US health insurance claims. The study population included all individuals with at least one ICD-10 code for COVID (U07.1) between June 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022. Individuals with at least one ICD-10 code for long COVID (U09.9), at least 7 days after COVID diagnosis were termed "Long COVID" patients. Index date was defined as the first long COVID diagnosis date. We also assessed the most prevalent diagnosis codes within the 30 days pre- and post-index to understand top symptoms. Result(s): A cohort of 253,145 patients (62% female patients;38% male patients) were identified. Among this cohort, 3.2% were pediatric patients aged 0 - 17 years;73.3 % aged 18 - 64 years and 23.5 % aged 65+ years. Most prevalent symptoms that increased in the 30 day pre- and post-index: Nervous system symptoms (6 fold), fatigue (7 fold), Dyspnea (4.3 fold), esophagitis (1.6 fold) chronic kidney disease (1.3 fold) among others. Conclusion(s): Our findings indicate that long COVID is more prevalent in females, with fatigue and dyspnea emerging as top symptoms. These findings are consistent with the published literature. However, we uncovered additional symptoms such as nervous system symptoms, chronic kidney disease among others. Additional analysis is planned to evaluate the association of these symptoms with sociodemographic features to understand the health inequity aspects of long COVID.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The United States health care system lacks uniform and universal health coverage, causing approximately 10% of the population to be without health insurance, a critical determinant of health care access. Safety net organizations, including free clinics, provide free and/or reduced health care services to sociodemographic disadvantaged individuals. Despite concerns about the uninsured population, free clinic patients have not been sufficiently studied. This dissertation was designed to address this gap by adding to the literature and was designed around three empirical chapters utilizing mixed methodology.The first study used cross-sectional primary data to examine the differences between perceived and physiological stress levels and the effect of a social support network among uninsured free clinic patients. Findings suggest that higher levels of perceived stress are not significantly more prevalent than higher levels of salivary cortisol among these populations. Higher levels of social networking are significantly associated with lower perceived stress levels;having more friends than family members is slightly more associated with lower levels of perceived. However, social support and networking was not significantly associated with patients' salivary morning cortisol levels.The second study utilized a qualitative approach regarding COVID-19 vaccine perception and hesitancy among uninsured free clinic patients. Social networks are found to be important factors in reducing vaccine hesitancy. Hesitant patients had concerns related to vaccines' safety, effectiveness, and side effects. Lack of valid and reliable COVID-19 vaccination information was a challenge among this study's participants.The third study also utilized cross-sectional primary data to examine whether certain factors, including the component of patient-centeredness, are associated with patient autonomy among these populations. Findings conclude that Spanish speaking patients at the free clinic have a stronger belief in a paternalist model of the provider-patient relationship. Better communication between patients and providers results in higher levels of autonomy. Higher levels of educational attainment and better communication partnership were associated with higher levels of a free clinic patient's understanding of treatment risks.In conclusion, this dissertation's focus was to understand characteristics of an uninsured population to help develop strategies and intervention on changing behaviors, providing information that leads to their better health outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is still spreading worldwide and it has resulted in severe economic disruptions and unrivalled challenges to health-care system. Aims and Objectives: This study was planned to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, practice, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination among medical professionals. Material(s) and Method(s): A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 276 medical professionals working in Puducherry using convenience sampling method. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages were computed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software 28.0 Version. Pearson's Chi-square analysis and multinomial regression analysis were performed. Result(s): Among the 276 respondents, 71 (25.7%) were affected with COVID-19 infection, 274 (99.2%) got vaccinated. Two doses were taken by 90.6% and 24 (8.7%) had received one dose of vaccination during the study period. Adequate knowledge was seen (P = 0.029) among the doctors who received two doses of vaccination (P = 0.019). Positive attitude was observed among the professionals who were vaccinated with CoviShield (P <= 0.001) and received two doses of vaccination (P = 0.003). About 79% of participants experienced common side effects due to vaccination. About 83.3% of participants were willing to take Booster dose and their choice of vaccine was CoviShield 76.4%, Covaxin 21.7%, and only 12% endorsed Sputnik V. About 69.2% of them have accepted that after mass vaccination campaigns, COVID-19 infection has been reduced. Conclusion(s): The present study findings showed adequate knowledge, favorable attitude, good practice, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination. Public health officials should utilize this opportunity and engage the medical professionals in educational campaigns which could reduce the misconceptions and alleviate the fear about the vaccination among the general population.Copyright © 2023, Mr Bhawani Singh. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Many patients with long COVID experience at least one vision problem. This study determines the association of long COVID with seeing difficulties. Method(s): We conducted a cross-sectional analysis with the Census Household Pulse Survey data (N = 51,288). We excluded adults who reported contracting COVID within the past four weeks, those with missing data on seeing difficulty when infected with COVID, and long COVID. Long COVID was defined as having symptoms lasting three months or longer that the adults did not have prior to having COVID. Adults self-reporting to a question on seeing with "some difficulty," "a lot of difficulty," or "unable to do" were classified as having "seeing difficulties." We conducted Chi-square tests and logistic regressions with replicate weights. Logistic regressions adjusted for long COVID, sex, age, race and ethnicity, marital status, income, education, food sufficiency, health insurance, remote work, vaccine doses, region, depression, and anxiety. Result(s): During the survey period (November 2 - November 14, 2022), 37.3% reported seeing difficulties, and 14.4% reported long COVID. A higher percentage of adults with long COVID reported seeing difficulties than those without long COVID (47.6% vs. 31.9%). In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, compared to adults with no COVID or without long COVID, those with long COVID had greater odds of seeing difficulties (AOR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.32, 1.70). We did not observe a statistically significant difference between adults without long COVID and no COVID (AOR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.93, 1.10 p = 0.7888). Conclusion(s): One in eight adults had long COVID. Adults with long COVID had significantly higher odds of seeing difficulties than those without long COVID. Therefore, a follow-up of patients with long COVID needs to include screening for seeing difficulties. More research is needed on the links between long Covid and vision care.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: The mains and objectives of the study was to evaluate the impact of Covid'19 vaccination on mental health status. Study Design: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study. Place and Duration: It is a cross-sectional study which was conducted by the house officers and the faculty of Dow International Dental College from june2022 to January 2023. Methodology: This study was conducted by distributing the questionnaire among the patients coming to the Outpatient Department at Dow International Dental College. A total of 280 Questionnaires were filled among the Vaccinated Patients coming to the OPD. Questions were inquired related to demographics, dosage, history, last dose, and benefit of vaccine, depression, sleep deprivation, feeling low, trouble concentrating and suicidal thoughts. The consent to fill this questionnaire by the patient was taken by 'Implied Consent'. It was in English language but was translated in Urdu by the house officers whenever it was needed to ensure the comprehension of the questions to the patients. The filled questionnaire was collected by the house officers of the dental department. A total of more than 280 questionnaires were distributed among the participants out of which 250 questionnaires were filled correctly giving us a response rate of 89.2% and dropouts of 10.8%. Practical Implications: The results of this cross-sectional clinical study have practical implications for the wider community. Encouraging Covid-19 vaccination can have a positive impact on both physical and mental health, and promoting vaccine uptake may lead to improved mental health outcomes for individuals. Such benefits can reduce the overall burden of mental health issues during the pandemic, which is beneficial to the community. Thus, public health campaigns should focus on the potential positive effects of Covid-19 vaccines on mental health to improve community well-being and promote vaccine acceptance. Result(s): Approximately 48% women and 52% male have anxiety, depression or either disorder, respectively. Adults with anxiety and depression were more likely to have low educational attainment, low household income, lack of health insurance and either lack or delay medical care. The filled questionnaire was collected by the house officers of the dental department. A total of more than 280 questionnaires were distributed among the participants out of whom 250 questionnaires were filled correctly giving us a response rate of 89.2% and dropouts of 10.8%. There was a common mental impact that was noticed and brought about people's mental health at stake. Conclusion(s): Forceful vaccination has a potential to affect mental health of an individual. Further studies are required to extrapolate the findings of the present study.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate adverse effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (COVAXIN) in a pregnant woman with that of a nonpregnant woman. Material(s) and Method(s): It is a prospective observational study done at Vanivilas Hospital, Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute (BMCRI) for 2 months. The sample size was 100 pregnant and 100 nonpregnant women. Telephonically, patients were followed-up, and details of the side/adverse effects were collected in a proforma after 2 and 14 days. Data collected from both groups were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Result(s): The majority of women were in the age group of <=25 years (64.0% and 36.0%, respectively) with a mean age of 25.01 +/- 3.71 years among the pregnant and 28.52 +/- 6.00 years among nonpregnant women. About 25.0% of pregnant women and 38.0% of nonpregnant women reported side effects. About 15.0% and 22.0% had taken treatment for side effects among pregnant women and nonpregnant women, respectively. Among the pregnant women, the common side effects reported were injection site pain (17) followed by fever (5), fatigue (4), and myalgia (03). Whereas among the nonpregnant women, the common side effects reported were injection site pain (28) followed by fever (6), myalgia (3), headache (2), and fatigue (1). Conclusion(s): Side effects reported following the administration of Covaxin in pregnant and nonpregnant women are fever, fatigue, injection site pain, myalgia, and headache. The proportion of side effects was not significantly different in the pregnant and nonpregnant women following Covaxin administration. Clinical significance: Covaxin is an inactivated killed vaccine against COVID-19 by Bharat Biotech. The vaccine has been recommended for pregnant women by the Government of India during corona pandemic. Studies are lacking regarding the difference in adverse events in pregnant versus nonpregnant women, after vaccine administration.Copyright © The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Puerto Rico has endured three major environmental and public health crises (Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Maria, the unprecedented seismic activity of January 2020) and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during the past 5 years. All these events might lead to an unquestionable deleterious impact in the prevention of cancer and across the cancer continuum, exacerbating cancer health disparities in the future. Cancer screening plays a critical role in early cancer detection. COVID-19 has significantly hampered screening programs in many countries' cancer screening infrastructure and services, affecting adherence. Cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Puerto Rico. Limited information is available about the impact the current pandemic on colorectal cancer screening. In this study, we aim to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer screening in 2020 and assess if this impact varied by health regions. METHOD(S): This study analyzed administrative data claims from the Public Health System of Puerto Rico which is managed by the Government of Puerto Rico through the Health Insurance Administration. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes included for this study were (81528, 82270, G0104, G0105, G0121, G0328, G0464). To assess changes in the numbers of colorectal cancer screening claims between the incurred year (2016 and 2020), Poisson regression was used. Initially, we fitted this model with only the incurred year as the predictor and offsetting the model with the annual average of total insured (univariate model). Based on this model, we estimate the magnitude of association between the number of claims and incurred year using the Prevalence Ratio (PR) of claims. Lastly, Poisson univariate regression model were used for each of the seven health regions (Ponce, Bayamon, Caguas, Mayaguez, Metro, Arecibo and Fajardo) to assess potential geographic disparities. RESULT(S): The numbers of colorectal cancer screening claims significantly decreased by 40% (PRcrude: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.59, 0.62) in 2020 when compared to 2016. However, when adjusting for claim incurred month, sex, health region and offsetting the model with the annual average of total insured, the numbers of colorectal cancer screening claims significantly decreased by 34%, (PRadj: 0.66, 95%CI: 0.64, 0.67). The numbers of colorectal cancer screening claims significantly decreased in all health regions in 2020 when compared to 2016 (p<0.05). However, the most impacted region was the Eastern region, Fajardo, with a 64% (PRFajardocrude: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.30, 0.42) significant decrease in numbers of colorectal cancer screening claims. CONCLUSION(S): COVID-19 had a profound negative effect on colorectal screening in Puerto Rico. Moreover, despite the beneficiaries of this governmental health plan sharing similar sociodemographic and socioeconomic background, regional differences were observed.
ABSTRACT
Am J Manag Care. 2023;29(6):In Press _____ Takeaway Points The value of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine services offered by academic health systems is understudied. * DTC telemedicine services for low-acuity or minor illnesses are increasingly offered as an employee benefit, but any per-episode unit cost advantage may be offset by overuse of care. * DTC telemedicine staffed by an academic health system and offered to its employees resulted in lower per-episode unit costs for care within 7 days and only marginally increased the use of services. * DTC telemedicine staffed by an academic health system and offered directly to employees was cost-saving. _____ Employers in the United States have increasingly been offering a direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine benefit for low-acuity or minor illnesses to their employees.1-3 By 2021, more than 95% of employers with 50 or more employees provided some coverage for DTC telemedicine in their largest health plan;more than 75% felt that offering telemedicine was important and nearly 20% either limited or eliminated cost sharing for telemedicine.4 Despite these trends among general employers, few health systems have directly provided DTC telemedicine to their own employees. [...]because these services are easy to access (often available immediately, around the clock, and without travel), they may induce overuse of care, especially for self-limited conditions such as viral upper respiratory infections for which the alternative to in-person care is no care at all, thus increasing the overall cost of care.5-11 Telemedicine will save money relative to in-person care if any unit price advantages are not overwhelmed by the increased use of care overall, induced by its convenience. Employers provide health insurance coverage for 158 million Americans or nearly 50% of the population. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, telemedicine has represented a significantly larger portion of all medical claims—consistently more than 5% of all medical claims by mid-202112-15—and the estimated value of the global telemedicine industry is projected to reach a quarter of a trillion dollars by 2024.13 Yet, the future of telemedicine remains undetermined with reimbursement rates in debate,16-18 driven in large part because its economic value is understudied and uncertain. Penn Medicine is self-insured and more than 95% of employees use its only employer-sponsored plan—a preferred provider organization (PPO) plan—rather than insurance obtained individually or through a family member. Since 2017, these PPO-insured employees have been offered Penn Medicine OnDemand,19 a 24/7 DTC telemedicine benefit to employees and their adult (≥ 18 years) dependents.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 92 papers. The topics discussed include: cellular and humoral immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pediatric kidney recipients;adult outcomes of childhood-onset idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: findings from a health insurance database;the genetic landscape and clinical spectrum of nephronophthisis and related ciliopathies;translational profiling of developing podocytes during glomerulogenesis;MAGED2 is required under hypoxia for cAMP signaling by inhibiting MDM2-dependent endocytosis of G-Alpha-S;high throughput investigation of the metabolic flux of intact cortical kidney tubules;peritoneal membrane junction and solute transporter expression and function in health, CKD and PD;and Function and interaction of coronavirus ion channel proteins.
ABSTRACT
Emerging evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has extracted a substantial toll on immigrant communities in the United States, due in part to increased potential risk of exposure for immigrants to COVID-19 in the workplace. In this article, we use federal guidance on which industries in the United States were designated essential during the COVID-19 pandemic, information about the ability to work remotely, and data from the 2019 American Community Survey to estimate the distribution of essential frontline workers by nativity and immigrant legal status. Central to our analysis is a proxy measure of working in the primary or secondary sector of the segmented labor market. Our results indicate that a larger proportion of foreign-born workers are essential frontline workers compared to native-born workers and that 70 percent of unauthorized immigrant workers are essential frontline workers. Disparities in essential frontline worker status are most pronounced for unauthorized immigrant workers and native-born workers in the secondary sector of the labor market. These results suggest that larger proportions of foreign-born workers, and especially unauthorized immigrant workers, face greater risk of potential exposure to COVID-19 in the workplace than native-born workers. Social determinants of health such as lack of access to health insurance and living in overcrowded housing indicate that unauthorized immigrant essential frontline workers may be more vulnerable to poor health outcomes related to COVID-19 than other groups of essential frontline workers. These findings help to provide a plausible explanation for why COVID-19 mortality rates for immigrants are higher than mortality rates for native-born residents.
ABSTRACT
Speed read Nigeria's president-elect eyes 40 per cent health insurance coverage in two years Ambitious target needs funding, human resources Over 75,000 nurses and midwives left Nigeria in five years [LAGOS] Health experts in Nigeria say the country's president-elect who will be inaugurated on 29 May must prioritise health care and refrain from politicising it. While Nigeria committed to achieving universal health coverage (UHC) by 2030, its National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) established in 2005 makes health insurance coverage voluntary. [...]in May 2022, after two decades of sustained calls by health professionals, a new Act was passed which aimed to provide health insurance for all Nigerians, through a mandatory mechanism and in collaboration with state health insurance agencies.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Since 2016, Sudan was transitioning from limited healthcare subsidization to universal health coverage (UHC). Increasing healthcare access was widely considered beneficial, but some worried that UHC would overwhelm clinical services. In 2020 and 2021 UHC faced the challenge of Covid-19. We undertook a review of national healthcare utilization and enrolment data in order to better understand the impact of UHC in Sudan. Method(s): We conducted a descriptive study using National Health Insurance Fund databases. We analyzed annual enrolment, participating facilities, prescription volume and utilization from 2016 to 2021. Enrolment was stratified by employment status (government, informal sector, private sector, pensioner, impoverished). Utilization was assessed by type of care: primary, specialty, chronic disease and other;we calculated the ratio of primary to specialty care visits. We used the Mann-Kendall test for evaluating trends. Result(s): Participating facilities increased from 2,083 in 2016 to 3,549 in 2019, with slight contraction to 3,495 during 2020-21. Annual enrolment increased significantly, from 16.4 million in 2016 to 36.5 million in 2021 (p value < 0.01). The impoverished sector had the largest increase in enrolment (217%);informal sector had the lowest enrolment growth rate (7%). Volume of primary healthcare visits and prescriptions increased every year, except 2020, the first year of Covid-19 in Sudan. Specialty healthcare visits decreased over the same period, from 2,461,424 to 1,249,585 (p < 0.01). The ratio of primary to specialty visits increased from 6.0 in 2016 to 15.7 in 2021 (p < 0.001). Conclusion(s): In Sudan, transition to UHC increased utilization of primary care services, but at a slower rate than enrolment growth. The ratio of primary to specialty visits increased and specialty visits declined, suggesting that more primary care may have prevented specialist-requiring disease states and sequelae. Fears of overwhelming the health system were unfounded indicating that other barriers to healthcare might exist.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The stormy clouds of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak caused a rapidly spreading epidemic still hanging over the sphere. Any steps to transition toward a new normal should be guided by health authorities, together with economic and societal considerations. There are various items mainly falling into three classifications, including patient worry, clinical demand, and economic recession. Social distancing, lay-offs, and decreased number of patients with health insurance may lead to a prolonged period to retrieve normalcy. To return to a new normal, an individualized management model should be developed for each laboratory based on staff, instruments, services, crowding, physical space, hospital base unit, or outpatient clinic. Continuous training of different occupational staffs is among the key parameters in maintaining this readiness. The proposed response model should have internal and systemic integrity as well as coherence among the included items in two intra- and inter-unit management categories, namely thinking globally and acting locally.Copyright © 2021 mums.ac.ir All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aim: This study examined the relationships between stress, excessive drinking, including binge and heavy drinking, and health insurance status among a regionally representative sample of adults living in Northern Larimer County, Colorado, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Subject and methods: Data from 551 adults aged 18 to 64 years (62.98% aged 45 to 65 years; 73.22% female; 92.98% non-Hispanic White) were used. The sample was weighted by age and binary sex. A series of logistic regressions were applied to examine bivariate associations among stress, drinking, and health insurance status, with and without accounting for the effects of sociodemographic and health-related covariates. Stratified analyses were applied to explore differential associations of stress and drinking among individuals with different health insurance coverage. Results: A total of 23.23% of the adult sample reported binge drinking, and 16.15% reported heavy drinking; 10.53% of the sample reported both binge and heavy drinking. Individuals with higher levels of stress were more likely to report binge drinking (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.65, 1.68) and heavy drinking (OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 2.54, 2.67), after adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related covariates. Relative to individuals with private health insurance coverage, adults enrolled in Medicaid and those without health insurance coverage were more susceptible to the effect of stress on binge and heavy drinking. Conclusion: Our results highlighted a need for continuing statewide and/or national efforts in closing the insurance coverage gap and providing affordable marketplace health insurance in the hope of preventing excessive drinking due to high levels of stress during a challenging time.